YOU ARE NOW CONNECTED TO THE TOXLINE (1981 FORWARD, NON-ROYALTY) FILE. ==PSA AND PROSTATE== 1 AUTHOR Roach M 3rd TITLE Neoadjuvant therapy prior to radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. SOURCE Eur Urol; VOL 32 Suppl 3, 1997, P48-54 (REF: 34) ABSTRACT The optimal treatment for many unresectable solid tumors involves the combined use of chemotherapy and radiation. Retrospective and prospective randomized trials demonstrating a reduction in failure rates when neoadjuvant androgen suppression is combined with radiotherapy suggest that this is also likely to be true for prostate cancer. The absence of overlapping toxicities, the high response rates to androgen suppression, and the ease with which the prostate is included in radiotherapy portals makes the prostate an ideal site for chemoradiation. Since radiation and hormonally mediated apoptosis appear to be induced by different mechanisms their interaction may well be synergistic. Volumetric changes induced by hormonal suppression facilitate radioactive implantation in the prostate in men with large glands. This neoadjuvant approach also reduces the amount of normal tissue to be irradiated when used prior to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy while allowing higher doses to the tumor. It may be particularly important to use antiandrogens to block the 'intraprostatic flare' that may result from the testosterone surge induced by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone in patients undergoing neoadjuvant (short course) androgen suppression. Men who are at particularly 'high risk' for biochemical failure when treated with radiotherapy alone should probably receive a 'longer' course of complete neoadjuvant and possibly adjuvant hormonal blockade, but the optimal duration and sequence of androgen suppression remain to be defined. 2 AUTHOR Petrovich Z AUTHOR Baert L AUTHOR Bagshaw MA AUTHOR Brady LW AUTHOR Elgamal A AUTHOR Goethuys H AUTHOR Heilman HP AUTHOR Kirkels WJ AUTHOR Lieskovsky G AUTHOR Perez CA AUTHOR Van Poppel H AUTHOR Williams RD TITLE Adenocarcinoma of the prostate: innovations in management. SOURCE Am J Clin Oncol; VOL 20, ISS 2, 1997, P111-9 (REF: 62) ABSTRACT Adenocarcinoma of the prostate (CaP) in the Western world has become the most common noncutaneous human tumor. CaP is also the second most important cause of cancer deaths among the male population in the United States. Major progress was made in the past decade in better understanding this disease process, as well as in improved diagnostic accuracy. This improved diagnostic accuracy was due to wide application of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), use of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and greater awareness among clinicians of CaP. The use of PSA in clinical practice has resulted in a sharp increase in the number of patients diagnosed with capsule-confined tumors. The optimal treatment for capsule-confined CaP is in the process of being defined. Radical prostatectomy in the United States is currently the most commonly applied treatment for younger patients. Excellent treatment results with a 10-year actuarial survival > 80% are readily obtainable in properly selected patients. Nerve-sparing procedures helped reduce the high incidence of impotence that occurs in patients after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Radiotherapy remains the other curative treatment method in the management of CaP patients, with long-term survival rates similar to those reported in surgical series. Due to the problem of frequent preoperative tumor understaging, a routine use of postoperative irradiation to the prostatic fossa produces an excellent (> 95%) incidence of local tumor control. Management of patients with metastatic disease has undergone a considerable evolution with the development of modern hormonal management and treatment with strontium-89 to control intractable bone pain. Newer treatment methods such as hyperthermia are currently being investigated. Major efforts are directed toward the reduction of short- and long-term treatment toxicity associated with surgery, radiotherapy, and hormonal management, thus improving patient quality of life. 3 AUTHOR Jewett MA AUTHOR Khakpour G AUTHOR Moore MJ TITLE Supportive care is not the only option in prostate cancer patients resistant to hormone therapy: the argument against. SOURCE Eur Urol; VOL 29 Suppl 2, 1996, P45-8 (REF: 11) ABSTRACT Hormone-resistant prostate cancer patients are elderly, frail and in pain. They have a median survival of 6 months. There is no convincing evidence from controlled trials that anything we do will increase life expectancy. Any attempt to do so with currently available agents may either kill them earlier or decrease the quality of the short life left to them. The alternatives for management include the simple, non-toxic, supportive measures of better analgesic use, antiandrogen withdrawal, external beam radiation and steroids, which can produce significant symptomatic improvement. There is little evidence that the benefits of more aggressive therapy exceed those achieved with supportive care. 1 AUTHOR Herold D AUTHOR Hanks G AUTHOR Movsas B AUTHOR Hanlon A TITLE Postradiotherapy PSA nadirs fail to support dose escalation study in patients with pretreatment PSA values < 10 ng/ml. SOURCE Radiat Oncol Investig; VOL 5, ISS 1, 1997, P15-9 ABSTRACT With three-dimensional conformal therapy, doses > 75 Gy have been delivered to the prostate with acceptable levels of morbidity; however, higher doses do appear to increase late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) morbidity. Because patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values < 10 ng/ml can achieve 3-year actuarial bNED control rates of 90% after treatment with external beam radiotherapy to doses < 71 Gy, one might question the need for further dose escalation in this population. In this report, we examined the relationship between dose and PSA nadir for 90 patients with pretreatment PSA values < 10 ng/ml entered into a dose escalation study from March 1987 to October 1992. We wanted to see if nadir response data would predict a different outcome from our 3-year bNED control reports. All patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy to ICRU reporting point doses of 6,598 cGy to 7,895 cGy (median of 7,068 cGy). Minimum follow-up was 36 months (median, 47 months). Seven hundred thirty-nine posttreatment PSA nadir values were analyzed, yielding an average of 8.2 values per patient. Estimates of rates of bNED control and time to reach a posttreatment PSA of 1.0 ng/ml were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences in rates according to dose levels. Linear regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to relate dose to bNED control on a continuum. Escalating doses from 66 to 79 Gy failed to increase the percentage of patients achieving nadir values < 1 ng/ml and similarly failed to increase the 3-year actuarial bNED control. Linear regression (P = .81) and the chi-square test of association (P = .23) supported the lack of a dose effect on nadir continuously and categorically, respectively, and the Cox regression model supported the conclusion that dose on a continuum has no effect on bNED control (P = .34). Furthermore, time to reach a posttreatment PSA level of 1.0 ng/ml was not statistically dependent on dose level (P = .13). Based on this study and prior reports demonstrating a dose response for late GI/GU morbidity, we question whether further dose escalation in this subgroup of patients is justified.