==BILE-DUCT NEOPLASMS== YOU ARE NOW CONNECTED TO THE TOXLINE (1981 FORWARD, NON-ROYALTY) FILE. 4 AUTHOR Orth HB AUTHOR Stalder GA AUTHOR Landmann C AUTHOR Herrmann R TITLE [Which way ahead? Carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas, the gallbladder and the bile ducts--nonsurgical therapy in the locally advanced and in the metastasized stage] SOURCE Schweiz Med Wochenschr; VOL 124, ISS 20, 1994, P837-45 (REF: 96) ABSTRACT Carcinomas of the pancreas, gallbladder and bile ducts in inoperable stages can be treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and a combination of both modalities. Therapy is always palliative. In the past 20 years treatment results have not improved. Patients treated should be entered in controlled clinical studies with new substances randomized versus less toxic 5-FU or optimum supportive care. Pain and jaundice can be relieved by radiotherapy, bypass surgery and stent insertion. The choice of an option should be made according to patient characteristics and risk factors, as well as the possibilities and experience of the treating center. 3 AUTHOR Montemaggi P AUTHOR Morganti AG AUTHOR Dobelbower RR Jr AUTHOR Brizi G AUTHOR Smaniotto D AUTHOR Costamagna G AUTHOR Cellini N AUTHOR Marano P TITLE Role of intraluminal brachytherapy in extrahepatic bile duct and pancreatic cancers: is it just for palliation? SOURCE Radiology; VOL 199, ISS 3, 1996, P861-6 ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To evaluate intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) in patients with extrahepatic bile duct or pancreatic cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients (aged 33-87 years) with unresectable extrahepatic bile duct (n = 18) or pancreatic (n = 13) cancer received ILBT exclusively or as part of a definitive treatment regimen. ILBT was performed with transhepatic percutaneous drainage in four patients and with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 27. Fourteen patients with no metastases, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of < or = 2, and good hematologic parameters received combined modality treatment: 30-Gy ILBT and 45-Gy external-beam radiation therapy with continuous infusion of fluorouracil. Seventeen patients underwent 50-Gy ILBT alone for palliation. RESULTS: No direct treatment-related acute toxic reactions were seen. Three patients had cholangitis early in the study. Three patients had late gastrointestinal bleeding. Jaundice was palliated in all patients (n = 29); pain, in 11 of 13 patients. The survival rate in patients with extrahepatic bile duct cancer was 62% (five of eight) at 2 years for combined modality treatment. No patient with pancreatic cancer lived for longer than 2 years. CONCLUSION: ILBT is an effective palliative treatment of unresectable extrahepatic bile duct and pancreatic cancers. Results suggest a possible "curative" role in specific clinical settings when properly integrated with other treatments. 4 AUTHOR Kamada T AUTHOR Saitou H AUTHOR Takamura A AUTHOR Nojima T AUTHOR Okushiba SI TITLE The role of radiotherapy in the management of extrahepatic bile duct cancer: an analysis of 145 consecutive patients treated with intraluminal and/or external beam radiotherapy [see comments] SOURCE Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; VOL 34, ISS 4, 1996, P767-74 ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of high dose radiotherapy and to evaluate its role in the management of extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1983 and 1991, 145 consecutive patients with EHBD cancer were treated by low dose rate intraluminal 192Ir irradiation (ILRT) either alone or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Among the primarily irradiated, 77 patients unsuitable for surgical resection, 54 were enrolled in radical radiotherapy, and 23 received palliative radiotherapy. Fifty-nine received postoperative radiotherapy, and the remaining 9 preoperative radiotherapy. The mean radiation dose was 67.8 Gy, ranging from 10 to 135 Gy. Intraluminal 192Ir irradiation was indicated in 103 patients, and 85 of them were combined with EBRT. Expandable metallic biliary endoprosthesis (EMBE) was used in 32 primarily irradiated patients (31 radical and 1 palliative radiotherapy) after the completion of radiotherapy. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates for all 145 patients were 55%, 18%, and 10%, for the 54 patients treated by radical radiotherapy (mean 83.1 Gy), 56%, 13%, and 6% [median survival time (MST) 12.4 months], and for the 59 patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy (mean 61.6 Gy), 73%, 31%, and 18% (MST 21.5 months), respectively. Expandable metallic biliary endoprosthesis was useful for the early establishment of an internal bile passage in radically irradiated patients and MST of 14.9 months in these 31 patients was significantly longer than that of 9.3 months in the remaining 23 patients without EMBE placement (p < 0.05). Eighteen patients whose surgical margins were positive in the hepatic side bile duct(s) showed significantly better survival compared with 15 patients whose surgical margins were positive in the adjacent structure(s) (44% vs. 0% survival at 3 years, p < 0.001). No survival benefit was obtained in patients given palliative or preoperative radiotherapy. Gastroduodenal complications increased in those receiving doses of 90 Gy or more, and serious biliary bleeding was experienced in three preoperatively irradiated patients. Complications in other patients was tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose radiotherapy, consisting of ILRT and EBRT, appears to be feasible in the management of EHBD cancer, and it offers a survival advantage for patients not suited for surgical resection and patients with positive margins in the resected end of the hepatic side bile duct. Expandable metallic biliary endoprosthesis assists the internal bile flow and may lengthen survival after high dose radiotherapy. 14 AUTHOR Schuster-Uitterhoeve AL AUTHOR Gonzalez Gonzalez D AUTHOR Blank LE TITLE Radiotherapy with multiple fractions per day in pancreatic and bile duct cancer. SOURCE Radiother Oncol; VOL 7, ISS 3, 1986, P205-13 ABSTRACT Twenty patients with pancreatic and bile duct cancer have been treated with external radiotherapy with multiple fractions per day (MFD). All patients had localized disease only. Sixteen patients have been treated with a split-course technique, to a dose of 60 to 70 Gy in 7-8 weeks, four patients had a continuous series of 44 Gy in 19 days. The mean survival was 7.9 months for patients with a pancreatic cancer. Four out of nine patients with pancreatic cancer in whom the tumour was evaluable showed a tumour regression, one out of nine reached a partial remission. The mean survival in the responders was 9.5 months. All patients with pancreatic cancer died of their tumour. Four out of eight patients with bile duct cancer died of their tumour, the mean survival was 10 months. Four patients with bile duct cancer are still alive (10+, 10+, 10+, 11+ months). No serious acute toxicity was seen. Six patients showed gastrointestinal toxicity at 1.5 to 9 months after the end of treatment. All of them could be treated in a conservative way. From the results obtained in this feasibility study, radiotherapy with MFD in pancreatic and bile duct cancer appears to achieve similar tumour response as conventionally fractionated radiotherapy and the observed toxicity of MFD can be considered as acceptable. MFD might be a more appropriate treatment scheme for combination with chemotherapy and radiosensitizers. --MEDLINE-- Ann Surg 1998 Jun;227(6):821-31 Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors. Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. OBJECTIVE: This single-institution experience retrospectively reviews the outcomes in a group of patients treated 5 or more years ago by pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Controversy exists regarding the benefit of resection for periampullary adenocarcinoma, particularly for pancreatic tumors. Many series report only Kaplan-Meier actuarial 5-year survival rates. There are believed to be discrepancies between the actuarial 5-year survival data and the actual 5-year survival rates. METHODS: From April 1970 through May 1992, 242 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenal resection for periampullary adenocarcinoma at The Johns Hopkins Hospital. Follow-up was complete through May 1997. All pathology specimens were reviewed and categorized. Actual 5-year survival rates were calculated. The demographic, intraoperative, pathologic, and postoperative features of patients surviving > or =5 years were compared with those of patients who survived <5 years. RESULTS: Of the 242 patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma, 149 (62%) were pancreatic primaries, 46 (19%) arose in the ampulla, 30 (12%) were distal bile duct cancers, and 17 (7%) were duodenal cancers. There was a 5.3% operative mortality rate during the 22 years of the review, with a 2% operative mortality rate in the last 100 patients. There were 58 5-year survivors, 28 7-year survivors, and 7 10-year survivors. The tumor-specific 5-year actual survival rates were pancreatic 15%, ampullary 39%, distal bile duct 27%, and duodenal 59%. When compared with patients who did not survive 5 years, the 5-year survivors had a significantly higher percentage of well-differentiated tumors (14% vs. 4%; p = 0.02) and higher incidences of negative resection margins (98% vs. 73%, p < 0.0001) and negative nodal status (62% vs. 31%, p < 0.0001). The tumor-specific 10-year actuarial survival rates were pancreatic 5%, ampullary 25%, distal bile duct 21%, and duodenal 59%. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma treated by pancreaticoduodenectomy, those with duodenal adenocarcinoma are most likely to survive long term. Five-year survival is less likely for patients with ampullary, distal bile duct, and pancreatic primaries, in declining order. Resection margin status, resected lymph node status, and degree of tumor differentiation also significantly influence long-term outcome. Particularly for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 5-year survival is not equated with cure, because many patients die of recurrent disease >5 years after resection. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ann Surg 1995 Nov;222(5):619-25 Extrahepatic biliary cystadenomas and cystadenocarcinoma. Report of seven cases and review of the literature. Davies W, Chow M, Nagorney D Division of Gastroenterologic and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to describe the clinical features, diagnosis, pathologic characteristics, and optimal surgical management for patients with extrahepatic biliary cystadenomas. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Extrahepatic biliary cystadenomas are rare epithelial neoplasms. The clinical features and optimal surgical management for these lesions have not been defined clearly. The usual presenting symptom is jaundice. These lesions should be considered premalignant and necessitate resection. Sporadic case studies have reported instances of recurrence with local excision. To the authors' knowledge, this study represents the largest collected single series of extrahepatic biliary cystadenomas and reviews previously reported cases. METHODS: The authors reviewed and reported their institutional experience from 1950 to 1993 in treating seven patients with extrahepatic biliary cystadenomas as well as 19 previously reported cases in the literature. RESULTS: A strong female predominance (96.3% of patients reviewed) was associated with extrahepatic biliary cystadenomas. Obstructive jaundice was the most common presenting symptom (85%). Abdominal pain occurred in 50% of patients; other symptoms included fever and hemobilia. The most common site of occurrence was the common hepatic duct (32%). Papillary cystadenoma with foci of invasive adenocarcinoma, thus supporting the malignant potential of cystadenomas, occurred in one patient. Local excision from the wall of the bile duct was performed in 18 patients and was associated with 50% recurrence within a mean follow-up of 13 months (range, 4-24 months). No recurrence was reported after formal sleeve resection and bilioenteric reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Extrahepatic biliary cystadenomas can become malignant, and in this study, local surgical excision was associated with a 50% local recurrence rate. Sleeve resection with negative histologic resection margins followed by bilioenteric reconstruction, therefore, is recommended. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ann Surg 1999 Mar;229(3):393-400 Reexploration for periampullary carcinoma: resectability, perioperative results, pathology, and long-term outcome. Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Huang JJ, Hruban RH, Yeo CJ Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-4679, USA. OBJECTIVE: This single-institution experience retrospectively reviews the outcomes of patients undergoing reexploration for periampullary carcinoma at a high-volume center. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Many patients are referred to tertiary centers with periampullary carcinoma after their tumors were deemed unresectable at previous laparotomy. In carefully selected patients, tumor resection is often possible; however, the perioperative results and long-term outcome have not been well defined. METHODS: From November 1991 through December 1997, 78 patients who underwent previous exploratory laparotomy and/or palliative surgery for suspected periampullary carcinoma underwent reexploration. The operative outcome, resectability rate, pathology, and long-term survival rate were compared with 690 concurrent patients who had not undergone previous exploratory surgery. RESULTS: Fifty-two of the 78 patients (67%) undergoing reexploration underwent successful resection by pancreaticoduodenectomy; the remaining 26 patients (34%) were deemed to have unresectable disease. Compared with the 690 patients who had not undergone recent related surgery, the patients in the reoperative group were similar with respect to gender, race, and resectability rate but were significantly younger. The distribution of periampullary cancers by site in the reoperative group undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 52) was 60%, 19%, 15%, and 6% for pancreatic, ampullary, distal bile duct, and duodenal tumors, respectively. These figures were similar to the 65%, 14%, 16% and 5% for resectable periampullary cancers found in the primary surgery group (n = 460). Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements did not differ between the two groups. However, the mean operative time was 7.4 hours in the reoperative group, significantly longer than in the control group. On pathologic examination, reoperative patients had smaller tumors, and the percentage of patients with positive lymph nodes in the resection specimen was significantly less. The incidence of positive margins was similar between the two groups. Postoperative lengths of stay, complication rates, and perioperative mortality rates were not higher in reoperative patients. The long-term survival rate was similar between the two resected groups, with a median survival of 24 months in the reoperative group and 20 months in those without previous exploration. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that patients undergoing reoperation for periampullary carcinoma have similar resectability, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival rates as patients undergoing initial exploration. The results suggest that selected patients considered to have unresectable disease at previous surgery should undergo restaging and reexploration at specialized high-volume centers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ J Gastrointest Surg 1998 May-Jun;2(3):207-16 Should pancreaticoduodenectomy be performed in octogenarians? Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Talamini MA, Hruban RH, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Ord SE, Grochow LB, Abrams RA, Pitt HA Departments of Surgery, Oncology, and Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. As the population in the United States ages, an increasing number of elderly patients may be considered for pancreaticoduodenal resection. This high-volume, single-institution experience examines the morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival of 727 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy between December 1986 and June 1996. Outcomes of patients 80 years of age and older (n = 46) were compared to those of patients younger than 80 years. In these older patients, pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 25; 54%), ampullary adenocarcinoma (n = 9; 20%) distal bile duct adenocarcinoma (n = 5; 11%), duodenal adenocarcinoma (n = 2; 4%), cystadenocarcinoma; (n = 2; 4%), cystadenoma (n = 1; 2%), and chronic pancreatitis (n = 2; 4%). When compared to the 681 concurrent patients younger than 80 years who were undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, the two groups were statistically similar with respect to sex, race, intraoperative blood loss, and type of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed. Patients 80 years of age or older had a shorter median operative time (6.4 hours vs. 7.0 hours; P = 0.02) but a longer postoperative length of stay (median = 15 days vs. 13 days; P = 0.01) and a higher complication rate (57% vs. 41%; P = 0.05) when compared to their younger counterparts. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the older group resulted in a 4.3% perioperative mortality rate compared to 1.6% in the younger group (P = NS). In the subset of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma (n = 495), patients 80 years of age or older (n = 41) had a median survival of 32 months and a 5-year survival rate of 19%, compared to 20 months and 27%, respectively, in patients younger than 80 years (n = 454; P = 0.77). These data demonstrate that pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed safely in selected patients 80 years of age or older, with morbidity and mortality rates approaching those observed in younger patients. Based on these data, age alone should not be a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ J Am Coll Surg 1999 Jun;188(6):658-66; discussion 666-9 Surgical palliation of unresectable periampullary adenocarcinoma in the 1990s. Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Huang JJ, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287-4679, USA. BACKGROUND: Advances in the nonoperative staging and palliation of periampullary carcinoma have dramatically changed the management of this disease. Currently, surgical palliation is used primarily for patients found to be unresectable at the time of laparotomy performed for the purpose of determining resectability. STUDY DESIGN: A review of all patients undergoing operative management for periampullary adenocarcinoma at a single, high-volume institution was performed. The review focused on patients found to be unresectable who, therefore, underwent surgical palliation. RESULTS: Between December 1991 and December 1997, 256 patients with unresectable periampullary adenocarcinoma were operatively palliated. During the same time period, 512 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for periampullary carcinoma. Sixty-eight percent of patients were unresectable secondary to liver metastases or peritoneal metastases, and 32% were deemed unresectable because of local vascular invasion. Of the 256 patients, 51% underwent double bypass (hepaticojejunostomy [HJ] and gastrojejunostomy [GJ]), 11% underwent HJ alone, 19% underwent GJ alone, and 19% did not undergo any form of bypass. Celiac block was performed in 75% of patients. Palliated patients were significantly younger, with a mean age of 64.0 years compared with 65.8 years in the resected group (p = 0.04). Gender and race distributions were similar in the 2 groups, with 57% of palliated patients and 55% of resected patients being men (p = NS) and 91% of patients in each group being Caucasian (p = NS). Palliative procedures were performed with a mortality rate of 3.1%, compared to 1.9% in those successfully resected (p = NS). Those undergoing operative palliation had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications when compared with those undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (22% versus 35%, p<0.0001) and had significantly shorter lengths of stay (10.3 days versus 14.8 days, p<0.0001). As expected, palliated patients had a significantly poorer prognosis, with 1-, 2- and 4-year survivals of 25%, 9%, and 6% (median 6.5 months), respectively, compared with 75%, 47%, and 24% in their resectable counterparts (median 21 months, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical palliation continues to play an important role in the management of periampullary carcinoma. In this high-volume center, 33% of patients undergoing operative management of this disease were unresectable. Surgical palliation can be accomplished with acceptable perioperative mortality (3.1%) and morbidity (22%), with excellent longterm results.