Cuban statement on Nato's war
Source Louis Proyect
Date 99/06/24/17:43

NATIONS RESOLUTIONS 1160 (1998), 1199 (1999), 1203 (1998), 1239
(1999)." NEW YORK, 10 JUNE 1999.

Mr. President:

The Security Council is late. The resolution it has just adopted will
not change reality. This has been and will continue to be a U.S. and
NATO invasion. The disregard for the United Nations and disobedience
to the Security Council are irreparable. The aggressors will never be
impartial and will never restore the principles they have trampled
upon. The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia's sovereignty and territorial
integrity -solemnly and hypocritically proclaimed- is absolutely
unfeasible after the imposed conditions, and the forcible
disintegration of a sovereign State is not being disguised.

Seven days have gone after the acceptance by the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia's Government and the Serbian Parliament of the peace
proposal conveyed by the High Special Envoys.

In this time period, however, there have been 3,684 NATO sorties and
996 strikes against a wide range of targets, including civilian
targets, according to the latest available information. After the
Serbian acceptance, innocent people continued to be killed or wounded,
and the deliberate destruction of the country went on. This week,
after the demands presented by NATO -added to the Envoys' already
Draconian proposal- it has become more apparent that the United States
and NATO were not seeking a political solution but rather the
consolidation of a new world power mechanism, the destruction of
Serbia, the liquidation of its Government and the humiliation of its
people. It is now confirmed that negotiation is not possible under the

There is no doubt now -if ever there was one- about the real goal of
this disproportionate aggression. For 79 days, a colossal military,
economic and technological force attacked with impunity a small
developing country, carrying out 35,778 combat and support missions.
The aggressors' combined GDP is 1,163 times that of their victim;
their population is 77-fold; their territory 226-fold, and their
regular troops are 43-fold. The Serbian people's resistance has been
heroic, at the cost of thousands of civilians dead or wounded,
enormous deprivation, the destruction of their country, the indelible
trauma of the bombardments in their children's minds. The aggressors
deserve no laurels.

The Security Council's silence will not erase the images of the bombed
Grdelica Jorge passenger train; of the Djakovica-Pec convoy of
Albanian refugees; of the civilian facilities in Belgrade and Novi
Sad; of the Paracin, Kralijevo, Sremska Mitrovica villages; the
Serbian television station, the Luzane bus, the Surdulica
neighborhood, the Lucani factory, the power generators, the potable
water grids, the Valjevo hospital, the Greek convoy near Vlac, the
People's Republic of China's Embassy, the Nis market-place and
hospital complex, the Kosovar-Albanian Korisa village, 18 diplomatic
premises, the Istok prison, tens of bridges, railways and roads.

It has been a genocide. The systematic actions to deprive millions of
people of food, heat, drinking water and medical services; the
deliberate and daily strikes on non-military targets where civilians
were known to be, and the use of internationally banned weapons like
the uranium-coated and cluster bombs; or the indiscriminate use of
seismic bombs in urban areas and graphite bombs against power grids
-so as to paralyze every vital service- cannot be described otherwise.
These acts are in violation of the Geneva Conventions, International
Humanitarian Law and War Practices and Customs. Those responsible must
be exemplarily punished.

This war's environmental impact on the region is really inestimable.

The pretexts NATO politicians have stuffed their speeches with -lying
to their own nationals while ridiculously smiling- cannot withstand
any analysis.

They argued that they wanted to prevent a massive exodus of refugees
and created a true and readily predictable humanitarian catastrophe:
860,000 refugees left their country after the bombings began. The main
attacking countries have received only 30,703 refugees, 3.6% of the
number they created by their bombings. The United States and the
United Kingdom, as a whole, have received 0.9%. Two-thirds of the
Bosnia refugees whose return had been planned for this year have not
returned and nobody is in charge.

They wanted to defend the Albanian-Kosovar people's human rights and
prevent the so-called "ethnic cleansing": those who are bombing have
too many old and current sins for anyone to believe in their
sincerity. They also have a double-standard tradition that morally
disqualifies them.

The United States and some of its allies -breaching international
sanctions- maintained the apartheid regime, tolerated atrocities in
Cambodia and Central America and coexisted with the fascist military
regimes in Latin America. They remain impassive and silent to the
crimes against the Arab peoples and to those now being flagrantly
committed against the Palestinian people. Three hundred Muslims -half
of them children under five- die every day in Iraq as a result of
sanctions and aggressions. They do not get upset about or make any
efforts to settle the conflicts in Africa, where 11 million refugees
are currently living in a true humanitarian emergency situation.

The United States currently maintains the segregation of its own
indigenous people in keeping with the best of traditions in ethnic
cleansing formerly used to exterminate them. Today, emigrants are
brutally persecuted; there are atrocious cases like those of Louima
and Diallo; and there is a differential ethnic pattern in society,
justice, the penal system and the application of the capital
punishment. Nor do the authors of dirty wars, extraterritorial laws
and genocidal blockades have the morality to teach humanitarian

It is quite conspicuous that NATO has not done or said anything about
the horrible exodus of numberless Serbs, among them 500,000 only from
Krajina -according to United Nations official figures- that unleashed
the premeditated disintegration of the former Yugoslavia, promoted by
a part of Europe and unanimously supported by the West.

Formerly, in 1941, the fascist government of Ante Pavelic, imposed on
Zagreb by Adolf Hitler and controlling Croatia, Bosnia, Herzebovina
and part of Voivodina up to the threshhold of Belgrade, established
the famous "doctrine of the three thirds": one-third of the Serbs was
to be expelled; another third assimilated and forcibly converted to
the official religion, and the third, physically eliminated. Many of
the converts were eventually eliminated, and as deportation became
difficult, extermination became the general formula applied. 675,00
Serbian civilians, of every age and sex, were murdered by Pavelic's
ustachas, according to the British Admiralty's well-documented

That holacaust took place scarcely 7 years before NATO was founded. Is
Europe not ashamed over the thousands of terribly destructive bombs
that NATO has just launched upon the Serbian people?

The current genocidal war, rather than helping harmony, has stirred
hatred and exacerbated ethnic and religious wars in Kosovo and the

It is also noteworthy that NATO's new "humanism" does not go as far as
NATO's pockets. Battle-hardened leaders of the most solvent attacking
powers have said without a flush that they will allocate no funds
until Serbia "becomes democratic." The interpretation is self-evident.
Apparently, "Phase IV" of the operation, with less puritan goals, is
being decreed.

Nor are there any concrete commitments to the damages, estimated at
$100 billion. Reconstruction is the international community's moral
duty and should be a legal obligation for the aggressors.

Cuba wishes to ratify its willingness to participate -to the extent of
its modest ability- in any project for the reconstruction of the
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, on humanitarian aid for the
Kosovar-Albanians, and renews the offer made as early as 5 April -12
days after the strikes began- to cooperate by sending, free of charge,
1,000 doctors to take care of refugees in their camps and after their
return home, as well as of those who might be in need in Kosovo, in
the rest of Serbia and Montenegro.

The survival of Europe's stability has also been seen as an objective
of the unleashed war. However, it is obvious that the region's
instability has grown. The occupation of Kosovo cannot be forever, nor
does the invaders' command offer any guarantees whatsoever. The
neighboring countries will have to face the consequences of what has
happened, at the cost of high risk for new conflicts or the
aggravation of those already underway.

In strongly condemning the crime committed against the Serbian people,
the Cuban Government supports, also, the Albanian-Kosovar people's
right to be fully guaranteed their national, cultural and religious
identity, and to enjoy the widest autonomy and, even, independence, if
-once a just and lasting peace not imposed on Serbia by an atrocious
war of aggression has been reached- Kosovars of all ethnic groups and
the Republic of Serbia should peacefully and democratically come to
that decision.

The path to peace goes through guaranteeing absolutely equal rights
and security for all national groups and through healing the hatred
exacerbated by aggression. A concrete program for reconstruction,
peace, security and stability in the region will be required. It is
our sincere hope that the neighboring countries will develop -with
intelligence, tolerance and altruism- the ability to avoid new
conflicts on grounds of respect for the rights of all national groups.

Mr. President:

Europe, paradoxically, has also been a victim. Although the objective
was to consolidate and establish NATO's offensive capabilities against
the rest of the world, what has actually been consolidated and
established, in a humiliating and lessening way for the European
sovereignty, is the United States hegemony over the old and cultured

It has been treated ostensibly as a minor partner. It is the United
States that makes all the decisions, lays out the strategy, exerts
command, makes use of the necessary military means and tests its new
and criminal technology in the European range.

The United States contributed 74% of the fighter planes, and 97% of
the airborne refuelling planes. Ninety percent of the bombs were
laser-guided, all of them US-made. It used thousands of cruise
missiles, deployed for the first time its B-2s, and spent billions of
dollars financing almost the entirety of the operation. It was an
American war, although some allies contend for credits, or attempts on
an impossible leadership.

However, it will be Europe that will have to pay the consequences of
the conflict, that will have to take on the humanitarian problems
created by the air strikes, that will probably have to provide the
eventual resources for reconstruction, and that will especially suffer
the more unstable conditions generated in the Balkans.

The currency of an integrated, politically independent, economically
powerful and cultured Europe has suffered a huge damage. The euro is
already paying for these mistakes in the stock exchange market.

Europe will have to rethink its objectives now that its subordination
has consolidated. It has been proved that it hurts them as the Bremen
Conference and now the EU Summit have agreed to create a "European
identity and defense capability."

On the other hand, NATO's "New Strategic Concept" and "Defense
Capability Initiative" consecrate its right to military intervention
at a world level. In Kosovo, the doctrine was put into practice before
it was even born.

It turns out that NATO, whose only value was its defensive nature and
whose only virtue had been its inactivity, is now declaring itself and
acting like the world gendarme. Without a Cold War or a real enemy, it
becomes an offensive alliance, announces that it will act beyond its
Member States' borders, that it will attack without being attacked,
when it deems its interests at stake, and that it will act outside the
UN when the latter becomes indocile.

We are promised that, by cannon shots, it will cope with "global
threats" like terrorism, drug trafficking, the existence of weapons of
mass destruction and human rights violations (curiously enough, there
is no mention of hunger and AIDS) and it will reserve the right to
decide what is a threat, and where and when it would call for becoming
a target of its missiles. The concept of the "diplomacy of force" is

The new "NATO humanitarianism" is just the right to "humanitarian
intervention", which nobody has defined nor the United Nations has
agreed upon.

The developing countries must look at Kosovo as the place where we
have been made collectively weaker against the powers' hegemonism and
military threat.

The frivolous rhetoric on the globalization "opportunities", the myth
of the "new financial architecture" or the "United Nations reform"
mirage has been exposed in the Balkans. Today, the risks and
challenges are clearer. No one will give us anything away. It is not a
consolation that our creditors, passengers on the same boat, will go
down with us. Developing countries, together, will have to forge by
ourselves our common future in a globalized world.

Mr. President:

The Alliance owns the aircrafts and the newspapers. The war show is
another consumer good. The war and the information market have found
in Kosovo common interests and huge revenues. NATO's war has filled
the coffers of smart weapons manufacturers and producers of silly TV

The epidemic violence of the societies that have bombed the FRY cannot
be detached from this war. Children are shooting in United States
schools, following, in essence, the same logic their parents have
followed in Serbia.

Mr. President,

We are now witnessing the manipulation of the United Nations and the
Security Council. After 79 days of disobedience and contempt, they are
being used today to try to give the aggression an appearance of
legality. The UN Charter was ignored, and it is invoked now, even
though it has been replaced, in fact, by NATO's New Strategic Concept.
The collective security mechanism has been replaced -for the sake of
the powerful- by the law of the jungle. The International Court of
Justice did not declare the bombings illegal, thus rendering
International Law helpless. It is not new or exceptional for the
Commission on Human Rights to be manipulated, but it is serious that
it did not say that the air campaign is a massive, flagrant, feverish
and systematic violation of human rights.

The developing world suffers unipolarism the most and takes the
greatest chances with the weakening of the United Nations. The only
beneficiary is the United States. The only choice is to struggle
against these imperial practices, defend the United Nations, restore
respect for and implementation of the Charter, preserve the principles
of non-intervention, non-aggression, no threat or use of force and
respect for sovereignty.

The fact that NATO has had to come now to the Security Council signals
that this battle is still possible, and that if developing countries
use their strength, which is considerable when united, we will be able
to save the United Nations.

Thank you.

[View the list]

InternetBoard v1.0
Copyright (c) 1998, Joongpil Cho