What if the USG sold its gold?
Source Sean Andrews
Date 10/01/20/22:31

[Thomas Frank speculates on the ironies it would create amongst the
loony lib/right.-s]
One Cross of Gold, Coming Up
How the government could get even with right-wing cranks.

THESE ARE POLARIZED times, but one thing everyone agrees on is that it
sure is great when government makes a profit.

Supporters of President Obama like to point to recent TARP-loan
payoffs, plus interest, as an example of federal success. His
opponents, by and large, have long held that government should be run
like a business; their former leader, George W. Bush, once announced
that "government should be market-based."

It is a terrible idea. Were the government actually to begin
understanding itself as a market-based, profit-maximizing enterprise,
determined to bring down the deficit by whatever means present
themselves, can there be any doubt what it would do?

It would sell gold. Oh, it would sell lots of gold. It would put Fort
Knox on eBay. Mr. Obama could film the TV commercials.

The first reason for this is obvious: The price of gold is over $1,100
per ounce, near its all-time high in nominal dollars. At that price,
the Treasury's 261 million of ounces of gold would be worth nearly
$300 billion. Meanwhile, the government's enormous hoard of the stuff
is valued by the Treasury—according to a Web page entitled, "Fun Facts
About the United States Mint"—at only $42.22 per ounce. If they're
saving it for a rainy day, that day has arrived.

I know what you're thinking: Stupid liberal, if the Treasury started
unloading its gold—if it gave even the merest hint of doing so—it
would send the price of that commodity plummeting.

Which brings us to reason two. The other day, as I watched the
zillionth commercial for gold investments flicker by on Fox News, I
thought to myself: What would happen to the American right if the
price of gold suddenly tanked?

As anyone knows who has Googled the phrase, "FDR Gold Confiscation,"
gold has long been the obsessive investment choice of a certain
species of antigovernment crank. Its allure is especially strong for
the disaster cohort—for those who believe that hyperinflation is just
around the corner; that default by the U.S. government is a real
possibility; and that democracy itself is something of a fraud, a
populist Ponzi scheme pulled off by slimy politicians and the central
bankers they've hired to run the printing presses.

One reason gold has been bid to its current stratospheric heights is
because more and more investors and fund managers have signed on to
this dark belief that America's judgment day has finally come.

Were the administration to get started on the great gold dump,
however, we'd come to a different judgment day very quickly. When the
massively inflated price of that metal collapsed, it would probably
take with it a hefty chunk of the portfolios of tea-party types,
survivalists, Birchers, dittoheads, Objectivists and almost every
imaginable species of secular end-timer.

Achieving such an effect might not even require selling the gold,
either: The government could conceivably collapse the price merely by
implying that it intended to sell the stuff.

Of course, it is an article of my corny liberal faith that government
should never craft policy merely in order to damage its partisan
opponents. But if you believe that government should be run like a
business, then this, too, becomes thinkable. It was the supremely
market-minded men of Republican Washington, after all, who made
"Defund the Left" into one of their movement's guiding principles. It
was they who dreamed up the "K Street Project" and the other schemes
that were designed to reward GOP loyalists and redirect the revenue
streams of the Democratic Party.

If it's all about profit, why not take a page from that playbook?
Besides, the right already believes Mr. Obama to be an unholy amalgam
of Machiavelli, Pol Pot, and Bathhouse John Coughlin, guilty of the
worst deviltry Chicago has to offer. Why not serve a little up?

Just for fun, the administration could then smooth the whole thing
over with some tactical libertarian cant. It might declare that the
price of gold had been propped up artificially for decades by the
state's irrational hoarding. Privatization is a far better option,
administration officials might purr. It lets the market speak.

And so, in an irony worthy of Oscar Wilde, it would be the
gold-investing contingent of the right who would discover that they
had risked their fortunes on the whim of the very government they
distrust and despise.

But it is the opposite irony that probably ensures that a great
gold-dump will not take place. In addition to denting the holdings of
countless extremists, such a move would also deal a massive blow to
the hedge funds that have reportedly made enormous bets on the
barbaric metal. Their losses would then reverberate through the
financial system, inevitably shaking the institutions deemed "too big
to fail." And before long, government would have to ride to the rescue
of those who have wagered so much on the government's collapse.

Write to

[View the list]

InternetBoard v1.0
Copyright (c) 1998, Joongpil Cho